![]() |
|
||||
|
It looks like the moat is on the left side of the Han Great Wall in the first picture. Would that mean that the Han Wall is to the north and the Ming Wall is to the south, "behind" the Han Wall? If the Han Wall is 1.5 times as high as the Ming Wall, it seems like it would block the view of the enemy, unless one is looking from the top of a tower.
__________________
Bryan |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Did I say the Han Wall _is_ 1,5 times or did I say it _was_? Today and probably in Ming times it is only very low because it is all in debris. -chinoook Last edited by chinoook; 10-31-2008 at 02:41 PM. |
|
||||
|
Some additional photos of the Shandan GW from my Visit in September 2011.
Some of you know that in the mountains behind the wall in the north runs another, much older wall ... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() On one tower I found clear signs of overbuilding. I will check this on a later visit at Shandan, check whether this applies for all towers or for only single ones. ![]() A fortress with the Qilianshan in behind. View to the south. ![]() ![]() -chinoook
__________________
chinoook's 1st law: Structurally weak wall tend to have double structures. chinoook's 2nd law: Newer walls are built next older walls, not over them. chinoook's 3rd law: Similar problems lead to similar solutions. The most dangerous worldview is the worldview of people, who have not viewed the world. (Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859), German naturalist and explorer) Last edited by chinoook; 02-20-2013 at 04:29 PM. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| han dynasty, shandan |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| gansu shandan Gaoguandun | ch312 | Great Wall photos | 6 | 06-28-2012 06:23 PM |
| Video! Shandan Great Wall video | Bryan | Shandan | 4 | 12-26-2008 08:21 PM |
| Shandan Han/Ming Wall | chinoook | Shandan | 1 | 10-31-2008 01:23 PM |
| Shandan information | Bryan | Shandan | 5 | 06-05-2008 02:41 AM |