Great Wall Forum  

Go Back   Great Wall Forum > Great Wall Locations > Hebei Province (East) > Qinhuangdao > Banchangyu

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 01:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Taipei,Taiwan
Posts: 623
Default Bricks kiln

One of bricks kilns locates near banchangyu .volume production for Ming's GW and fortress .
Its coordinates is 40°12'0.31"N 119°33'55.01"E

The Great Wall of China
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 02:06 PM
chinoook's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,667
Default

Is that authentic? It is about one km away from the GW. And is the arrangement of bricks (on the right side) and the place for the fire (left side) logical? Could there be the intended temperature in the whole kiln? Is the size authentic?
Obviously it is built new. Was there an aciant kiln found in this place?


-chinoook
__________________
The most dangerous worldview is the worldview of people, who have not viewed the world. (Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859), German naturalist and explorer)

Last edited by chinoook; 04-21-2009 at 02:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 02:44 PM
Kim's Avatar
Kim Kim is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tangshan, Hebei province, China
Posts: 2,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chinoook View Post
Is that authentic? It is about one km away from the GW. And is the arrangement of bricks (on the right side) and the place for the fire (left side) logical? Could there be the intended temperature in the whole kiln? Is the size authentic?
Obviously it is built new. Was there an aciant kiln found in this place?
-chinoook
Looks original to me. The kilns was found with original bricks still in the kiln - this was also found other places in Hebei. They probably had some problems controlling the temperature inside the kiln. I've seen some examples of almost black bricks that have been fired at too high temperature, but these bad quality bricks seems to have been used at the inside of the wall - normally not visible.

New about the Banchangyu kiln here: http://www.china.org.cn/english/travel/52839.htm
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 02:55 PM
Kim's Avatar
Kim Kim is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tangshan, Hebei province, China
Posts: 2,044
Default

Some schematics of the kilns here:

http://www.meet-greatwall.org/zhuanzhu/wen/zyy.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 02:57 PM
chinoook's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,667
Default

Of course those are kilns and I also believe those are Ming Dynasty. But I learned that kilns for bricks used in the GW are only about some meters (!) away from the GW (e.g. Gubeikou). They had even been build high up there to reduce the effort of transportation. Kilns so far away of course could have been used but maybe for other builings than the GW. If these are really GW it means that there has been good transportation infrassttructure to the Wall.


-chinoook
__________________
The most dangerous worldview is the worldview of people, who have not viewed the world. (Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859), German naturalist and explorer)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 03:18 PM
Kim's Avatar
Kim Kim is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tangshan, Hebei province, China
Posts: 2,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chinoook View Post
Of course those are kilns and I also believe those are Ming Dynasty. But I learned that kilns for bricks used in the GW are only about some meters (!) away from the GW (e.g. Gubeikou). They had even been build high up there to reduce the effort of transportation. Kilns so far away of course could have been used but maybe for other builings than the GW. If these are really GW it means that there has been good transportation infrassttructure to the Wall.
-chinoook


That would only make sense if raw materials could be found locally right next to the wall. I most cases - in the mountains - there would most likely not be any access to raw materials (except stones), so it would be much more practical to "mass produce" the bricks at a central location and then transport them to the wall. Otherwise the raw material (clay, water, sand etc.) had to be transported up to the wall - it would be much easier to transport the finished bricks.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 03:33 PM
chinoook's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim View Post

That would only make sense if raw materials could be found locally right next to the wall. I most cases - in the mountains - there would most likely not be any access to raw materials (except stones), so it would be much more practical to "mass produce" the bricks at a central location and then transport them to the wall. Otherwise the raw material (clay, water, sand etc.) had to be transported up to the wall - it would be much easier to transport the finished bricks.
Ok, I can accept that.
At Gubeikou I wondered which clay (and water!) they used for it is in rocky area too. I concluded that there are (maybe) smaller places with "hidden" clay.
By now I wonder more where they got the wood (charcoal?). To my understanding even in early Ming the area was almoust treeless. If they had run a brick factory there they should have used enormous amounts of burning material.
It is somhow stiking that there where is clay everywhere (in the western parts) there had no bricks been used. Was the problem burning material (likely) or water (even likely)?


-chinoook
__________________
The most dangerous worldview is the worldview of people, who have not viewed the world. (Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859), German naturalist and explorer)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Taipei,Taiwan
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim View Post
Some schematics of the kilns here:

http://www.meet-greatwall.org/zhuanzhu/wen/zyy.htm
After reading the schematics of the kilns , the burning materials are local oak tree and pine tree, no source of clay, water information was mentioned .
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:43 AM
chinoook's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,667
Default

櫟屬 <=> Oak tree?
松屬 <=> Pine tree?

I wonder where they got that much wood. Oak tree is _very_ slow growing, Pine tree is fast growing but easy to cut. I would not assume that there had been Pine tree forests in Ming Dynasty close to the Wall.


-chinoook
__________________
The most dangerous worldview is the worldview of people, who have not viewed the world. (Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859), German naturalist and explorer)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:01 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Taipei,Taiwan
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chinoook View Post
櫟屬 <=> Oak tree?
松屬 <=> Pine tree?

-chinoook
Oak tree<=> 橡树
Pine tree<=> 松树
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inscribed bricks Kim Great Wall photos 17 06-12-2009 12:57 PM
Dynasy Ming bricks producing technology livart Banchangyu 0 05-05-2009 06:29 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright ©2007 - 2010, GreatWallForum.com
All rights reserved.